Posts Tagged ‘Immigration Reform’
June 14, 2013
Sen. Chuck Schumer gleefully said on the Senate floor that “illegal immigration will be a thing of the past” once his immigration bill is passed. Where, exactly, is the pride in solving an illegal act by making it legal? Is that the best we can do? Apparently, it is, and it is one more sign of our escalating decline.
There is little doubt that if Schumer’s “solution” is put into place, border crossings will increase by those seeking the amnesty Schumer is eager to offer. Crossings are already rising in Texas. Schumer’s promise of securing the border later is as meaningful as “you can keep the health insurance you have”. Our government has a long history of reneging on promises and cutting funds.
When society stigmatized divorce, we made divorce easily obtainable. Today, 50% of marriages end in divorce and the family unit is crumbling. When illegal alcohol spurred out-of-control organized crime, we made alcohol legal again and organized crime flooded the country with drugs. We “solved” illegal gambling by making it legal through casinos and membership in Gambling Anonymous is steadily rising. When teen pregnancies increased, we handed out condoms in elementary schools and began actively encouraging their frequent use, resulting in a single motherhood epidemic. We “solved” the problem of dangerous back-alley abortions by making abortion legal, resulting in more and more abortions that have gone so far as murder outside the womb.
There is a pattern here. Society and our “leaders” are solving difficult problems with easy fixes and no forethought to consequences. The current easy fix being generated for our runaway drug problem is to make drugs legal. Does anyone really believe flooding the free market with legal, dangerous drugs (and that will surely be a result) will curtail their usage?
Chuck Schumer’s victory dance is not only premature, it is ridiculous. Amnesty, especially before securing the border, is a politically expedient fix for a difficult problem that will cause more problems. Obamacare is a perfect example of a hasty, politically expedient fix resulting in a nightmare.
When will we ever learn?
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Abortion, current-events, Democrats, drugs, Gambling, health care reform, human-rights, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media Bias, ObamaCare, political correctness, politics, Progressivism, Republicans, Senator Chuck Schumer, sex, Society, teen pregnancy
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Abortion, Addiction, Amnesty, Congress, Democrats, Diversity, Dream Act, Entitlements, Family, health care reform, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, mandate, Media, ObamaCare, Planned Parenthood, Political correctness, Political Debate, Progressivism, Republicans, Senator Chuck Schumer | Leave a Comment »
June 10, 2013
Sen. Marco Rubio stated: “First comes the legalization. Then come the measures to secure the border. And then comes the process of permanent residence.” The security of this country should ALWAYS come first and if Rubio doesn’t understand that, he needs to go. Border security has been neglected far too long and a focus on social issues over security is dangerous and irresponsible.
Rubio’s backward agenda is one more sign that conservative values are being eroded by media pressure and vote pandering. The leftward shift of the political middle ground is being assisted by those who are freely giving up ground in a foolish effort to be popular with the loudest segment of the population rather than be true to long-held conservative values. This is an abandonment that will have dire consequences. Then again, consequences no longer seem to matter.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Congress, Democrats, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, National Security, political correctness, politics, Progressivism
Posted in 2016 Prtesidential election, Amnesty, campaigning, conservatism, Democracy, Democrats, Diversity, GOP, Homeland Security, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Marco Rubio, Media, Multiculturalism, National Security, politics, Progressivism, Republicans | 1 Comment »
May 27, 2013
Progressives love to point to Sweden as an example of the type of utopian society they believe their agenda creates, but this past week’s riots in Sweden are a direct result of the continuing denial such an agenda demands. In the face of these riots, that denial continues as the press tries hard not to report that the overwhelming majority of rioters are Muslims.
Starting in the 80’s, Sweden began admitting a large number of third world immigrants, creating a generous welfare system to help them settle and assimilate. Economic and political upheaval in countries such as Somalia, Eritrea, Afghanistan and Iraq brought a huge number of Muslims to welcoming Sweden. Rather than assimilate, however, they created their own communities mirroring the values and traditions of their Muslim homelands.
The progressive, non-judgmental attitude prevalent in Sweden not only allowed these communities to shun assimilation, it allowed, and encouraged, an entire generation of Muslim immigrants to grow dependent on the welfare system while being infused with values and traditions that clash with Western societies. The violence towards the West found in the Middle East Muslim world, therefore, became part of their upbringing.
As Sweden tries to address the economic burden of their welfare system and revamp immigration policies, accusations of discrimination abound from those who have benefited most from those progressive policies. The autonomous communities that have been allowed to form are becoming offensive to many and as refusal to change continues, discrimination will undoubtedly occur.
There is much confusion on the part of officials in Sweden concerning the riots. Fully engrossed in progressive idealism, they do not understand how the recipients of their generosity could do such a thing. For those without progressive blinders, it is an inevitable result of being conditioned to welfare and treated with non-judgmental deference.
There is a lesson to be learned from this, but it is highly doubtful progressives here will see it. They have the same idealistic blinders on, believing open immigration and unlimited welfare works. The mainstream media agrees and will continue to conceal the rot such policies bring. They are much too invested to turn back now and will not allow riots in Sweden to be an omen.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Deficit, Democrats, Economy, Entitlements, Homeland Security, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media Bias, political correctness, Progressivism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Amnesty, Class Warfare, Deficit, Democrats, Dependency, Discrimination, Diversity, Economy, education, Entitlements, Europe, Foreign Policy, Government Regulation, Human Rights, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, International Community, Islam, Liberalism, Media, Media Bias, Middle East, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Nanny State, National Security, Political correctness, politics, Progressivism, Rights, Socialism, Sweden | 1 Comment »
May 2, 2013
After the Boston bombings, a poll revealed that Fox News was the most watched and most trusted network covering the incident. Although the rejection of liberal biased networks is encouraging, damage caused by years of voter ignorance aided by media bias may be irreversible.
A recent poll shows that 42% of Americans don’t know that Obamacare has been passed into law. Unfortunately, many of these people vote. The hastily passed healthcare bill that is proving to be a disaster was sold to the public by a media vested in “making history” and reluctant to report on the bill’s failures. Congress is now trying to exempt itself from Obamacare while some unions, avid Obama backers, are trying to get many of its provisions repealed, but the media continues praising it.
Another poll shows that 55% of Americans don’t know that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the country, actually performs abortions. It receives taxpayer money based on the perception that its function is only women’s healthcare, a notion reinforced by President Obama stating publicly that Planned Parenthood provides mammograms, which it doesn’t.
The current trial of abortionist doctor Kermit Gosnell, accused of killing newborns as part of his abortion practice, went unmentioned by the mainstream media until it was forced to cover it because of the attention from Fox News and other responsible news outlets. The progressive media fully approves of abortion so it is reluctant to report anything negative concerning it.
Due to media-assisted voter ignorance, many abortion practices that most find despicable have taken root in society and flaws in Obamacare adversely affecting everyone have become law. It now seems likely that immigration reform will focus on amnesty and ignore border security, putting us all in danger for years to come.
Permanent damage has been done and more is sure to come if the biased media continues unfettered. A Republican White House would surely compel the liberal media to return to being a “watchdog” critically investigating administration policies. If that doesn’t occur, the damage already done will end up seeming miniscule compared to what is coming.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Abortion, abortion practice, barack obama, boston bombings, Democrats, education, health care reform, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media Bias, National Security, ObamaCare, political correctness, politics, Progressivism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Abortion, Democrats, education, Family, Feminism, GOP, health care, health care reform, Homeland Security, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media, Media Bias, Nanny State, ObamaCare, Planned Parenthood, Political correctness, Political Debate, politics, President Obama, Pro-Choice, Progressivism, Republicans, Social Media, Unions, Voter Fraud | Leave a Comment »
April 25, 2013
Once again, Ann Coulter shatters PC protocol and vocalizes what many think but fear to say. With so many people from around the world wanting to come to America, why is it that we refuse to be more selective with our immigration process? Bowing to diversity with our immigration policy is, literally, killing us.
From Ann Coulter
My thought is, maybe we should consider admitting immigrants who can succeed in America, rather than deadbeats…But we’re not allowed to “discriminate” in favor of immigrants who would be good for America. Instead of helping America, our immigration policies are designed to help other countries solve their internal problems by shipping their losers to us.
The problem isn’t just illegal immigration. I would rather have doctors and engineers sneaking into the country than legally arriving ditch-diggers…since 1969, about 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from the Third World. They bring Third World levels of poverty, fertility, illegitimacy and domestic violence with them. When they can’t make it in America, they simply go on welfare and sometimes strike out at Americans.
During the three years from 2010 through 2012, immigrants have committed about a dozen mass murders in this country, not including the 9/11 attack. The mass murderers were from Afghanistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Haiti, South Africa, Ethiopia and Mexico. None were from Canada or Western Europe…We ought to be able to do something about the people we chose to bring here.
Read it all here: The Problem Isn’t Just Illegal Immigration
DJH
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Democrats, Diversity, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, political correctness, Progressivism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Diversity, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Political correctness, Political Debate, politics, Progressivism | Leave a Comment »
April 21, 2013
Obama’s directives for the non-enforcement of immigration laws legitimized disrespect for the law. His continuing skirting of rules, laws, and regulations with executive orders and political maneuvering has displayed an arrogant disregard for the rule of law and has been a top-down example many are following.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano emulated Obama and blatantly ignored the law by issuing a memo offering a deferred action and employment authorization to illegal aliens which was part of the Dream Act that Congress refused to pass.
Deportation of non-citizens who commit crimes has been ignored under the current push for amnesty for all. This type of non-legal amnesty is being expanded and enforced more than current immigration laws, putting society at risk. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the dead terrorist who bombed the Boston marathon, is the latest example of someone who should have been deported (having been convicted of domestic violence) but was not.
The Northern District of Illinois has the lowest firearm prosecution rate of all federal court districts while Chicago, residing in that district, has one of the highest rates of gun-related murders. The cry for more gun laws continues, but current gun laws are not being enforced. They are being ignored.
In Denver, a publically announced and planned rally celebrating marijuana, which is still illegal to smoke in public, was held. Allowing (and ignoring) 80,000 people to openly break the law is a slap in the face to the rule of law. What signal does this send to our children? How can respect for the law survive?
Laws are to be followed, enforced, altered, or removed, but they should never be ignored. Judges may have discretionary powers when enforcing the law, but they have no right to ignore laws or make up new ones; nor does the president. Unfortunately, the example has been set and consequences are sure to come. Don’t be surprised when the hit.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:barack obama, boston marathon, current-events, Democrats, Entitlements, government, ICE, illegal aliens, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, law, Liberalism, Marijuana, political correctness, politics, Progressivism, slap in the face, terrorism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Amnesty, Children, Congress, Democracy, Democrats, Department of Justice, Dream Act, Gun Control, Homeland Security, ICE, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Janet Napolitano, Liberalism, Marijuana, Midicinal Marijuana, Multiculturalism, National Security, Political correctness, President Obama, Progressivism, State Rights, terrorism | Leave a Comment »
April 11, 2013
A bipartisan group of senators is ready to put forth a so-called “broad” immigration bill that is nothing but a farce. In today’s skewed political climate, “bipartisan” is only mentioned when conservatives cave in to the loud, shrill demands of the left. If a liberal moves to the right, he is called a traitor, a racist, or much worse, but never “bipartisan”.
Amnesty, the only goal of progressives’ immigration reform, is on the way. The “bipartisan” demand to secure the borders first, an absolute necessity before real immigration reform can begin, was given lip service and then watered-down to appease the “bipartisan” senators who will now pretend they fought hard for, and won, a working compromise.
The bill allows ten years of planning and/or securing the borders before any real impediment to citizenship can be put into place for failing to comply. Meanwhile, a path to citizenship for illegals will begin immediately with nothing to stop it from morphing into full-blown amnesty. In the span of ten years with little border security, that “path” to citizenship will become a fully paved, toll-free, four-lane, busy highway.
True comprehensive immigration reform is impossible until the borders are secure. Therefore, other immigration reforms will not even become a topic for discussion. One of those other reforms in need of addressing is assimilation.
According to a Hudson Institute’s comparison study of native-born to naturalized American citizens, native-born Americans are: 30% more likely to consider themselves American rather than citizens of the world; 30% more likely to believe the U.S. Constitution is a higher legal authority than international law; 31% more likely to believe schools should focus on American citizenship rather than ethnic pride; and 23% more likely to believe all citizens understand English.
Assimilation allowed the US to become a successful “melting pot” never before seen in the history of the world. We have become a less cohesive society the more we have ignored the importance of assimilation. We can’t realistically address this or other reforms until the borders are secure. This latest bill is a farce, reforms nothing, and opens the door to chaos.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:Amnesty, barack obama, border security, Democrats, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, political correctness, Progressivism, Racism, Republicans
Posted in 2016 Prtesidential election, Amnesty, conservatism, Democrats, Demographics, Diversity, Entitlements, Foreign Policy, GOP, Homeland Security, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Multiculturalism, National Security, Patriotism, Political correctness, Political Debate, politics, President Obama, Progressivism, Racism, Republicans, terrorism | 2 Comments »
April 10, 2013
Once the proverbial cat is out of the bag, it is next to impossible to get it back in. So it has been with laws. Once on the books, it has been very, very hard to get a law repealed unless, that is, repeal dovetails with the progressive agenda.
Colorado is set to erase the crime of adultery from its books in order to “keep the government out of people’s bedrooms” and because the law is “archaic”. It seems we are to ignore that the government has already been in our bedrooms forcing health insurers to pay for abortions and provide free contraception. As long as the government is watering-down morality, bedroom intrusion is acceptable.
The traditional family unit is no longer considered as important as self-gratification. Adultery, divorce, abortion, out-of-wedlock pregnancy, and open marriage have not only become acceptable, they are often being advocated. An entire generation has been raised with a low regard for the family unit and are left with no cornerstone for building the future.
Obamacare was passed hastily in order to satisfy Obama’s personal desire for universal health care. He did not read or understand the bill beforehand and didn’t care how damaging it could be as long as it was passed. Unfortunately, it will now be very difficult to get any of it changed or repealed. The common good was neglected in order to benefit 10% of the population – and there is no going back.
Gun control and immigration reform are the current cats being let out of the bag. Both require a serious and impartial analysis of consequences, but both will be handled by knee-jerk, emotional legislation instead. Years from now, there will be a lot of consternation as legislators try to repeal thE soon-to-be hastily passed laws. They will chase those cats for a long time but they will never get them back in the bag.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:barack obama, Democrats, Family, Gun control, health care reform, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, ObamaCare, personal desire, political correctness, Progressivism, proverbial cat, universal health care
Posted in Amnesty, Congress, Democrats, Dependency, Diversity, egotism, Entitlements, Family, Gun Control, health care reform, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, mandate, ObamaCare, Planned Parenthood, Political correctness, politics, President Obama, Pro-Choice, Progressivism, Rights, Social Media, Socialism | 1 Comment »
March 24, 2013
Repetition, repetition, repetition – It is the method being used by the left to forge public perception and pre-write history. The bombardment of false perceptions has taken root in many, and future historians may not be able to discern the truth. The squeaky wheel of the left may get the historians’ grease.
According to the progressive left (including, of course, the media): Dick Cheney is evil; the GOP is racist; the rich pay no taxes; Bush wrecked the economy; the Catholic Church promotes pedophilia; Obama has superior intelligence; the US is the most terroristic nation in the world; socialism works well; Castro is an humanitarian; there is no deficit problem; taxing the rich for their “fair share” will solve the deficit problem; limiting abortion is a war on women; Obamacare costs less; etc., etc.
The list goes on and on, with reality never making an appearance. Yet, these things are accepted by a lot of people, and they vote, sometimes more than once. Obama was elected, then re-elected, by an overflow of uninformed voters inundated with talking points from the media, celebrities, and progressive politicians. Nothing negative was attributed to Obama and, consequently, may not appear in future history books, either.
Before thinking this is too pessimistic, look at how many in the GOP have panicked and are now abandoning conservative principles in an effort to become “relevant” with what they perceive to be a progressive majority. They see the writing on the wall as: “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em”. For them, abortion is losing its ugliness, immigration reform is beginning to sound like amnesty, same-sex marriage suddenly appeared in the Constitution exactly where the right to bear arms disappeared, social issues are becoming the government’s main responsibility, and Obamacare is beginning to look cheap at twice the original estimate.
If the Republican Party caves, only one, distorted view of history will survive and it is currently being written. Historians will have to drink the Kool-Aid because it may be the only drink available.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, barack obama, Bucks County Republicans, current-events, Democrats, dick cheney, Economy, false perceptions, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media Bias, political correctness, politics, Progressivism, Republicans, same sex marriage, world socialism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Abortion, Amnesty, Celebrities, conservatism, Democrats, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Media, Media Bias, ObamaCare, Political correctness, politics, President George Bush, President Obama, Progressivism, Racism, Rights, Socialism | Leave a Comment »
February 19, 2013
The Western world, bathed in political correctness and bowing to the god of diversity, is financing its own demise. Fearing being judgmental, many western governments have adopted an attitude of moral equivalence that allows terrorists to use entitlements to wage holy war
Radical British Muslim preacher Anjem Choudary was caught on tape urging followers to “Claim your Jihad Seeker’s Allowance”, also known as state benefits, in order to wage holy war as he does. He mocked those working for a living, bragging about his state provided take-home pay that is more than some British soldiers fighting in Afghanistan earn.
According to The Sun, Choudary lives in a $500,000 house and earns an equivalent taxed salary of approximately $50,000/year from housing benefits, council tax allowances, income support, and child benefits. He preaches to followers: “You must hate in your heart”, urging Muslims to kill David Cameron, Barack Obama and the leaders of Pakistan and Egypt. This is allowed, and financed, by the British government.
Unconditional acceptance of political correctness and diversity is rotting the very core of Western civilization. The common good, as well as common sense, has been abandoned in favor of “progressiveness”, the new religion for those abhorring religions. As the cartoon character Pogo once wisely said, “We have met the enemy and he is us”.
Runaway entitlement programs are doing much more than providing sustenance for those who are truly in need. They are creating a culture of dependence which breeds contempt for the hand that feeds. They are providing enemies with a safe haven for plotting. They are becoming an addictive drug, allowing those addicted to grow in number and vote, as a block, for more of the drug.
Our enemies are not stupid – we are. Wake up and smell the rot.
David J. Hentosh
Tags:2016 Presidential election, Democrats, Economy, England, Entitlements, human-rights, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Middle East, Nanny State, political correctness, politics, Progressivism, Religion, terrorism
Posted in 2016 Presidential Election, Afghanistan, Democracy, Dependency, Diversity, Economy, Entitlements, Financial Reform, Foreign Policy, illegal immigration, Immigration Reform, Liberalism, Middle East, Multiculturalism, Muslims, Nanny State, Political correctness, Progressivism, Socialism, Taxes, terrorism | Leave a Comment »