PETA Sues for Whale Rights

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Miller is now reviewing a case in a California district court brought by PETA on behalf of five whales currently “enslaved” at SeaWorld. The judge is to determine whether or not the whales are protected under the 13th Amendment and share the same rights as people.

PETA’s mission to protect animals is admirable. However, PETA’s zeal often goes over-the-top and loses public support as a result. Publicity stunts, particularly the nude ones, certainly bring attention to PETA, but too often the attention is on the silliness of the stunts rather than the cause. This court case on behalf of the whales is no exception.

There is absolutely no reason to believe that the 13th Amendment, or any Amendment, was written with animals in mind. Trying to interpret it in this manner is nothing less than a distortion of original intent and, if successful, will become a Pandora’s Box of future lawsuits and inanities.

Consider the consequences should PITA win this lawsuit (not impossible in this strange land). There would be no reason at all to stop with whales (which would be discriminatory); therefore, all animals would quickly be granted the same “rights”. Rights bring responsibilities, a fact largely ignored by those who usually demand rights.

Responsibilities, at the very least, require one to respect and follow rules, laws, and traditions of the society granting those “rights”. Animals would then be expected to wear clothes (or at least cover their genitals in public), pay taxes, earn a living, vote, refrain from urinating or defecating in the street, purchase health insurance, not eat or abandon their babies, fornicate in private, not discriminate against other species, etc. etc.

It is true that there are people who routinely break or ignore all or many of the above-mentioned examples. Interestingly enough, those people are often called “animals” for doing so. We would, of course, have to coin a new word for them because calling them “animals” would become a hate crime.

David J. Hentosh

UPDATE: Case dismissed by Judge.


Tags: , ,

No Responses to “PETA Sues for Whale Rights”

  1. Karen Says:

    This would also play right into the Wildlands Project which is part of Agenda 21. The Wildlands Project was designed to turn a minimum of 50% of all land back hundreds of years where animals ran free. No roads, dams, homes etc. to stop their migratory patterns. Around these core wilderness areas will be buffer zones which equal another 25% of the land. That’s 75% of all land off limits to humans and all human activity. This will be accomplish with The White House Rural Council in which the government will take over all rural land as time goes by. They will do this using Smart Growth. Welcome to stack and pack housing and no cars folks. Just do some homework. Start with CA. Also google Wild lands Project. You Tube Agenda 21 for Dummies, You Tube Agenda 21 for Public Ifficials.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: